Lately, I’ve been thinking a lot about three things every artist is up against today: AI, authenticity, and the algorithm. These aren’t small forces by any stretch of the imagination. They shape what we see, what gets shared, and even how we feel about our own work.
This really hit me when I was scrolling through my feed and saw two very similar images stacked one after the other. One was influenced by AI. The other was fully human-made. What surprised me wasn’t the images themselves, it was the comments and social interaction they received. One post had quick praise and surface-level reactions. The other had people saying they came back to the image multiple times because of how it made them feel.
That moment made something very clear to me. Human-made images often come from real experiences, real places, and real emotions. They may not always stop the scroll right away, but they tend to stay with people longer. That difference matters.
Around the same time, I had the chance to record a podcast with my friend Nicholas Albert on the Lakescape Photography Podcast. We talked openly about art, editing, and how reality is different for every person behind the camera.
We also talked about the pressure artists feel to please purists, chase trends, or, in some cases, feed this algorithm. At the core of that conversation was one simple idea: your art should reflect your experience, not someone else’s expectations. You don’t need to apologize for your choices or your style if they are honest and authentic to you.
I don’t think the future of art is about beating AI or winning against the algorithm. I think it’s about understanding their role and then choosing authenticity anyway. AI can be a tool. The algorithm can be a delivery system. But authenticity is the signal that people respond to.
That’s the one thing we still control. My hope is that both the video and the podcast encourage you to trust your experience and keep making work that feels real to you, because that’s what people are looking for regardless of the algorithm or the likes, and shares.
Linked below are the two videos. If you are a podcast listener, you can find Nicholas’ podcast on these platforms: Spotify • Apple • YouTube








I was shocked that you showed the AI image that you edited. I didn’t figure you would ever go down that road. It’s one thing to edit either in Lightroom and or Photoshop to make one’s photo look like what they saw and other to do what you showed. This AI image thing is for some people to get noticed in life but eventually this whole thing with photography is going to come crashing down along with social media.
I’m an artist, I was an artist LONG before I was a photographer, about 20 years actually. I am open to new trends, but I, in no way, find AI images to be photographs and have a strong delineation between what is a photograph and what is generated art. I will always pursue new art trends to see how they fit into my work and the expression I want to make. It has nothing to do with “getting noticed in life” 😉
Let’s be clear, this is NOT photography and Photographers need to stop acting like there’s a turf war here. They are NOT photographs. They are digital art pieces that happen to look like photographs.
Very interesting and well mentioned the differences between the effects of IA made Images and and the human made images.Thanks
thank you for being open-minded to the topic.
Blake, yours re some of the most lucid comments I have heard about AI in photography. You are right: there is an almost visceral rejecti0on of anything having to do with AI, and especially generative AI, and I think that often, those who have a more balanced approach are frequently afraid to speak up or fear of being ridiculed. This is especially true in certain photography-oriented forums. Whether you offer Photoshop how-to advice or comment on other photography-related topics, you are always worth listening to. Thanks for all the knowledge you share so freely with all of us.
Thank you very much. I really appreciate your kindness, understanding, and grounded opinion on this. It’s a tough topic to navigate and this video took about 3 weeks to organize my thoughts to create a healthy atmosphere for discussion and debate. Very difficult to navigate in today’s “troll heavy” environment. I appreciate you.
Blake, Both your video and podcast with Nicholas are fantastic. Over the decades, as I’ve gone from the wet lab to the digital lab, I’ve been poked countless times. In that time, I’ve come up with some comments in the hope that I can crack the shell on purists. This has given me more insights for that transition and the newest (AI). I’m always interested in opening peoples minds to new possibilities to art. Thank You, Thank You, Thank You!!
In love it 😁 thanks for being open-minded and willing to embrace new tech as an art form. This one did a number on me, I was expecting the worst 🤣 but it’s bringing out the best 😁